Tarot deck and books for sale

For anyone interested in tarot, I've got a copy of the Haindl tarot that I'm looking to part with. Actually, I've got two. Oh, and three books.

I've got one deck-used, still with the box and little while book (though the box is a little ragged these days), one deck without the box and one copy of each of the three books written to go with it by Rachel Pollack.

As a package deal, I'm offering the deck in the box with the three books for $30. So that means you would get:

The Haindl Tarot deck by Hermann Haindl (includes little white book)
The Haindl Tarot: Minor Arcana by Rachel Pollack
The Haindl Tarot: Major Arcana by Rachel Pollack
The Haindl Tarot: A Reader's Handbook by Rachel Pollack

Bonus: I'll throw in the crocheted silk case that I made to keep the deck in. (This alone should be enough to convince you how much you want this set)

Also offering another copy of the deck- all cards present, no box, no little white book for $5. For an extra $10, I'll knit or crochet a cover out of recycled silk.

OR if you're really into it, I'll give you the whole ball of wax- All the books, both decks, the crocheted cover- PLUS I'll make another cover for the second deck for $40.

Considering that you would pay more than $40 for the reader's handbook alone if you went through Amazon...this is a pretty good deal.

The books are all quite used, but the bindings are fully intact and there is no major damage to any of them. I'll try to see if I can grab a picture tomorrow of all the stuff when there's daylight.

Or, uh, hey...if you just want a silk cover for a tarot deck you already own, ten bucks gets you one. I just need to know the length, width and depth of the deck. Color of yarn will be entirely dependent on what I pull out of my big old box of yarn.

If any of this interests you, leave a comment here- first come, first served and first come will be determined by the time stamp on your comment :-P

(PS- I'll take paypal, money order or if you happen to be in the neighborhood, you can give me cash.)

How about "No."? Does "No." work for you?

http://www.redding.com/news/2009/dec/08/redding-womans-christmas-carol-initiative-picks/

Merry Hyatt has found allies in her quest to put an initiative on the ballot next year requiring public schools to play Christmas carols.

Hyatt, who moved to Redding four months ago, said she joined the Redding Tea Party Patriots and recruited several members to help her collect the 433,971 signatures needed by March 29.

Hyatt said she has partnered with a couple of churches in Redding and one in Wildomar in Southern California to collect signatures. All the signature pages must be turned in together to the Shasta County registrar, she said.

The initiative would require schools to provide children the opportunity to listen to or perform Christmas carols, and would subject the schools to litigation if the rule isn't followed.

Schools currently are allowed to offer Christmas music as long as it is used for academic purposes rather than devotional purposes and isn't used to promote a particular religious belief, according to an analysis by the California Legislative Analyst's Office.

"Bottom line is Christmas is about Christmas," said Erin Ryan, president of the Redding Tea Party Patriots. "That's why we have it. It's not about winter solstice or Kwanzaa. It's like, 'wow you guys, it's called Christmas for a reason.' "

Ryan said Hyatt's initiative falls under the umbrella of causes the group supports, which concern limited government, following the constitution and fiscal responsibility.

But some groups say the initiative represents quite the opposite.

"I have two words to say about Ms. Hyatt's proposal: blatantly unconstitutional," said Rob Boston, senior policy analyst for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which is based in Washington, D.C., and has a local chapter in Sacramento.

Boston said he heard about the initiative in the news, which isn't surprising considering national newspapers such as The New York Times have published articles on Hyatt's efforts.

"In the unlikely event she got enough signatures to put it on the ballot and the even more unlikely event California passed it, it would be struck down by the courts," Boston said. "The courts have been very clear that public schools aren't supposed to be in the business of promoting or advocating religion."

Boston said he thinks Hyatt's initiative represents a larger issue of religious conservatives being unhappy with the changes resulting from American society becoming more diverse.

"The frustration some religious conservatives have is they want a mythological religious America that probably never existed," he said.

Hyatt, a substitute teacher who moved to Redding from Riverside, said her motivation for the initiative was to help restore children's moral compasses by inviting Jesus to school Christmas parties.

"He's the prince of peace; he's the only one who can get these kids to stop being so violent," she said in November.

Hyatt said she believes it is Americans' First Amendment right to worship.

"It's our right to have freedom to worship," she said. "That's why we came to this country. They came to be Christians and they're trying to take that away. They're out of line; we're not."

Boston said he believes proponents of Hyatt's initiative have unrealistic expectations.

"They're looking to the public schools system or the government to provide them a religious experience at Christmas," he said. "If you want a full-throttle religious Christmas experience, it's at church ... there's no shortage of those."

If kids want to sing Christmas songs, assuming they're not disrupting normal school activity, by all means let them. But for fuck's sake, public schools are not church. I'm not terribly worried about this passing into law, but it still pisses me off that someone thinks that she has the right not only to shove her religion onto other people but that she can coerce a public institution to do the work for her.

Christmas is a specific holiday, it is called Christmas for a reason. Yes, just like they said- it is. But Kwanzaa and Hanukkah and the Winter Solstice are also called those things for a reason.

Things like this just tie me up with inability to express how stupid they are. No one's preventing anyone from celebrating Christmas, why the fuck is it such a big deal if some people want to do something different at the same time of year? And where the fuck do you get off shoving your activities down other people's throats? Just.....gah....Get the hell over it already. Go to church to sing religious songs or sing them in your own fucking home, or even in the town square if you really want to. I won't stop you. But don't try to force everyone else to do what you want to do.

AND READ THE FUCKING CONSTITUTION, PEOPLE. Keep in mind that it applies to EVERYONE, not just you and the people that agree with you.

I have a new theory: The so-called "War on Christmas" was invented by people who want to shove their stuff on everyone else as an imaginary threat against which they can "fight back". Who's with me?

Thank you to the majority of people who DON'T try to impose your winter holiday and your god and views thereof and what might prevent violence on others.

Incidentally, it's the religiously-themed Christmas songs that annoy me the least. Some of them I even like. (In small, seasonally-appropriate doses.)